Top Posts & Pages
Tags
- Alister McGrath
- Alvin Plantinga
- Anthony Grayling
- Arguments against Theism
- Arif Ahmed
- Arminianism
- Athanasius
- Atheism
- Augustine
- B.B. Warfield
- Bible
- C.S. Lewis
- Calvinism
- Charles Wesley
- Chris J. H. Wright
- Christianity
- compatibilism
- Conor Cunningham
- Copernicus
- Creation
- creationism
- Daniel Came
- Daniel Dennett
- David Bentley Hart
- David Hume
- Denis Alexander
- Descartes
- determinism
- Edward Feser
- Eleonore Stump
- Epicurus
- epistemology
- evidence
- evil
- Evil God
- evolution
- Free Will
- Genesis
- God
- Gordon Clark
- Greg Boyd
- Hiddenness of God
- incompatibilism
- James White
- Jerry Walls
- John Calvin
- John Cottingham
- John Lennox
- John Locke
- John Loftus
- John Mackie
- John Piper
- John Polkinghorne
- John Wesley
- Julian Baggini
- Kant
- Keith Ward
- Linda Zagzebski
- Martin Luther
- Massimo Pigliucci
- Matthew Flannagan
- Michael Horton
- Michael Martin
- Michael Murray
- Michael Shermer
- Mike Ovey
- Molinism
- moral argument
- moral realism
- N.T. Wright
- New Atheism
- Nicholas Everitt
- Omnipotence
- Paul Draper
- Paul Helm
- Paul Moser
- Pelagianism
- Peter Boghossian
- Peter S. Williams
- Peter van Inwagen
- Philosophy of Religion
- Reasonable Faith
- Richard Carrier
- Richard Dawkins
- Richard Swinburne
- Robin Le Poidevin
- Roger Olson
- Sam Harris
- scepticism
- science
- Soctratic method
- Stefan Molyneux
- Stephen Law
- Terence Cuneo
- Theodicy
- theology
- the Remonstrants
- Thomas Aquinas
- Tim McGrew
- William Lane Craig
Blog Stats
- 72,189 hits
Category Archives: Epistemology
To tu quoque or not to tu quoque?
Or I might equally call this: Why pinching an Alvin Plantinga argument to one problem and applying it to another isn’t really good enough! Those of you who follow the exchange between Arminians and Calvinists will no doubt be aware … Continue reading
When ‘Street Epistemology’ met a real epistemologist
I would love to write an extensive commentary on the discussion between Tim McGrew and Peter Boghossian but, for reasons I explained the other day, I’m unable to do so right now. Whether there’s even a need for me … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Atheist apologists, Epistemology, Faith, New Atheism, Philosophy, Street Epistemology
Tagged Peter Boghossian, Tim McGrew
15 Comments
‘A Manual for Creating Atheists’ Part 5.3: Is Boghossian authentic?
In my last piece on Street Epistemology I reiterated why Christians should strongly reject Boghossian’s misunderstanding of the word faith and not allow themselves to have something projected upon them which they simply don’t believe. I am still in chapter … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Atheist apologists, Epistemology, Faith, New Atheism, Street Epistemology
Tagged Peter Boghossian
2 Comments
The British Humanist Association Part 1 – “How do we know what is true?”
The British Humanist Association this week launched four short videos on the internet to help better explain what Humanism is and what Humanists stand for. Each of them is narrated very professionally by the actor Stephen Fry. Since they touch … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Epistemology, Humanism, Science and Religion
35 Comments
‘A Manual for Creating Atheists’ Part 5.2: Foundationalism and Faith
I am roughly (according to my kindle) one quarter of the way though this book and it’s taken a long time in coming but Boghossian begins talking about which epistemological school of thought he wants his Street Epistemologists (SEs) to … Continue reading
‘A Manual for Creating Atheists’ Part 4: Epistemology
This is the fourth part of my analysis of Peter Boghossian’s book. For previous parts see here. After giving the potential Street Epistemologists (SE) some really misleading information about Christianity in chapters 1 and 2, he now proposes to give his … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Atheist apologists, Epistemology, Faith, New Atheism, Street Epistemology
Tagged Peter Boghossian, Stefan Molyneux, Tim McGrew
1 Comment
Daring to disagree with Plantinga and Pigliucci
Daring to publicly disagree with one professional philosopher is enough to make your hands sweaty but two at once! I had seen many fellow Christians recommending Plantinga’s recent interview with Gary Gutting as a masterclass in arguing that atheism is … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Epistemology, Evidentialism, Philosophy, Theodicy
Tagged Alvin Plantinga, Anthony Grayling, Atheism, Massimo Pigliucci, New Atheism, Richard Swinburne, Theodicy
3 Comments
‘A Manual for Creating Atheists’ Part 3.5: Knowledge claims
Between my last Boghossian post and this one it appears Peter might have seen my blog and some of my series so far. I was hopeful this might lead to a minor exchange (after all I’m yet to have ‘Street … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Atheist apologists, Epistemology, Faith, Philosophy, Street Epistemology
Tagged epistemology, New Atheism, Peter Boghossian, Reasonable Faith
3 Comments
Boghossian goes nuclear!
“You should never start at a maybe.” Peter Boghossian The philosopher Stephen Law, in his book Believing Bullshit has called this principle “Going nuclear!” [1] ‘Going nuclear’ is obviously an analogy for laying waste to the entire argument one is in. In … Continue reading
Posted in Atheism, Atheist apologists, Epistemology
Tagged Descartes, epistemology, Peter Boghossian, Stephen Law
2 Comments
Where is God?
I followed a link to the ‘The Official Blog of University of Missouri Sceptics, Atheists, Secular Humanists and Agnostics’ today. The article which had been recommended was called: ‘Are Christian Apologists Evidence Against Christianity?’ Since the only reply underneath the … Continue reading
You must be logged in to post a comment.